The GeForce GTX 660 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, however, it's a better value for money, as it's £1955.25 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 660
- Up to 91% cheaper – £199.98 vs £2155.23
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 140 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 660
Sep 6th, 2012
Average FPS
48
44%
Min 1% FPS
20
33%
Price, £
£199.98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.16/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, £
£2155.23
9%
Value, £/FPS
£19.95/FPS
21%
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 660
Sep 6th, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
32%
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
1.981 TFLOPS
22%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
140 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
| 82.56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.981 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |
