The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 150 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Average FPS
50
75%
Min 1% FPS
22
67%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
27.44 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
109.8 GTexel/s
69%
FP32
2.634 TFLOPS
51%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 16th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
27.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
109.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
2.634 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |