The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 170 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
41%
Min 1% FPS
16
29%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
99
100%
Min 1% FPS
55
100%
Price, £
£489
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.93/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
18%
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
105.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
224.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.181 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
170 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 128.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 13.17 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 105.6 GPixel/s |
| 52.67 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 224.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.263 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.181 TFLOPS |
