The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The Radeon R7 260X is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 1% less energy – 115 vs 116 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Mar 15th, 2011
Average FPS
40
82%
Min 1% FPS
15
71%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Mar 15th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
98.5 GB/s
95%
Pixel Fillrate
7.2 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
691.2 GFLOPS
35%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 550 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 15th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 116 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 98.5 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
| 28.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
| 691.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
