The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's £289.65 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 120 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 47% cheaper – £328.47 vs £618.12
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
85%
Min 1% FPS
44
81%
Price, £
£618.12
53%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
45%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, £
£328.47
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.35/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
63%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
