Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1002 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 16% better in Stray than Radeon Pro W6400 - 72 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
62
86%
Value, £/FPS
£3.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£226.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £226.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7262 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
86%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
87%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |