The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R5 240 OEM. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 50 vs 125 Watts
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R5 240 OEM for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£399.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£444.00
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
49%
Min 1% FPS
15
35%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
12%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| $229.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
336 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
85.68 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.24 GPixel/s |
157.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 18.72 GTexel/s |
5.027 TFLOPS | FP32 | 599 GFLOPS |
