Buy on Amazon
£220
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Prices and StockMSRP $149
Prices and Stock
MSRP $149
Buy on Amazon
£195
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
£319
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Buy on Amazon
£209
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
£482.04
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Boost Clock
Prices and StockMSRP $69
Prices and Stock
MSRP $69
Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 29% better in Dead Space than Radeon R7 240 - 54 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of Radeon R7 240
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Space than GeForce GTX 1650 - £0.86 vs £4.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GDDR5 is your ticket into PC gaming
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 506 minutes ago
Radeon R7 240
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
42
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£35.95
100%
Value Winner
Powercolor Radeon R7 240 (2GB GDDR5/PCI Express 3.0/780MHz/1150MHz)
Buy for £35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 507 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R7 240
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $149 | MSRP | $69 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |
PCs Using GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R7 240
With selected game settings
36 FPS
£24.97/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i9-9880H
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£899
In Stock
43 FPS
£33.35/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i9-11900
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£1,434
In Stock
44 FPS
£27.13/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-12100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,193.78
In Stock
37 FPS
£28.86/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10870H
32 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£1,068
In Stock
37 FPS
£26.86/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10870H
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£994
In Stock
Popular GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon R7 240 Comparisons
Compare 2 Graphics Cards in Games
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce RTX 3060
£257.97
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce RTX 3050
£169.97
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
Radeon RX 6600
£209.99
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
Radeon RX 580
£141.97
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce RTX 4060
£269.99
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
Radeon RX 7600
£258
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
Radeon RX 6400
£161.54
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
£199.99
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce RTX 2060
£269.99
GeForce GTX 1650
£220
vs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
£212.42
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GT 1030
£68.99
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
Radeon RX 550
£89.99
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GT 710
£44.69
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
£89.99
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GT 730
£57.6
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
£95.5
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce 210
£39.99
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce GT 740
£76.9
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
£134.94
Radeon R7 240
£35.95
vs
GeForce RTX 2080
£29.57