Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 1006 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 382% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 159 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
15%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| 1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1335 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
