The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 100 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
65%
Min 1% FPS
37
60%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
110
100%
Min 1% FPS
62
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
38%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.61 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| $159.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
100 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 55.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 90.72 GPixel/s |
| 138 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 181.4 GTexel/s |
| 4.416 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.61 TFLOPS |
