Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 419 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 30 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 37% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 228 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£521.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £521.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
25%
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro W6600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2580 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |