The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 120 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Average FPS
66
99%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
77%
FP32
3.935 TFLOPS
77%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 192.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
81.98 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 123 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
| 3.935 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
