The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 240 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £172.47 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 81% cheaper – £39.95 vs £212.42
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 240 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, £
£212.42
18%
Value, £/FPS
£3.86/FPS
25%
Buy on Amazon
£212.42
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£185.25
In Stock
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
75%
Min 1% FPS
16
64%
Price, £
£39.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 240 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 240 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
21%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $139.00 | MSRP | $69.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
44.54 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.6 GPixel/s |
66.82 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 14 GTexel/s |
2.138 TFLOPS | FP32 | 448 GFLOPS |
