The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
52%
Min 1% FPS
25
43%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£751.6
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.22/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
20%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
20%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
