The GeForce GT 650M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 650M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 45 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 650M
Mar 22nd, 2012
Average FPS
41
25%
Min 1% FPS
16
16%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, £
£541.14
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£541.14
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,243.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£752.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,101.83
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,540.02
In Stock
GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 650M
Mar 22nd, 2012
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
7.6 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
30.4 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
729.6 GFLOPS
3%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 650M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Navi II |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 30.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
| 729.6 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |
