The GeForce GT 645M is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 645M
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 31 vs 32 Watts
GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 645M
Oct 1st, 2012
Average FPS
41
100%
Min 1% FPS
16
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 645M
Oct 1st, 2012
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
24.96 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
7%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 645M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce 600M | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
32 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
24.96 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |