In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GT 425M is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 23 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Up to 3900% faster in Battlefield 6 – 40 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 3900% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 29, 2019 vs Sep 03, 2010
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 1 GB
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
40 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
30 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 425M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
1 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
2.24 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
8.96 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
215 GFLOPS
4%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 425M Sep 3rd, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Oct 29th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Released | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
23 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
