The GeForce 940MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 940MX
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 23 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 940MX
Jun 28th, 2016
Average FPS
42
52%
Min 1% FPS
17
40%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£399.99
In Stock
GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 940MX
Jun 28th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
6.888 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
27.55 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
881.7 GFLOPS
18%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 940MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 28th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
23 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.888 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 27.55 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 881.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
