The GeForce 940M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 940M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 75 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
42
52%
Min 1% FPS
16
37%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£399.99
In Stock
GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
17.57 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
35.14 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
1.124 TFLOPS
22%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 940M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.57 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 35.14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 1.124 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
