The GeForce 920MX is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 16 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- A much faster GPU for gaming
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Average FPS
41
98%
Min 1% FPS
16
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
100%
Min 1% FPS
16
100%
Price, £
£81.06
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
7.944 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
23.83 GTexel/s
81%
FP32
508.4 GFLOPS
54%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
16 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.944 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
| 23.83 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
| 508.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |
