Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms GeForce 920MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 436 days newer than GeForce 920MX.
Advantages of GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 16 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce 920MX - 138 vs 132 FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
GeForce 920MX
Mobile • Mar 25th, 2016
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 920MX | vs | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
965 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 993 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
