The GeForce 920MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 16 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Average FPS
41
64%
Min 1% FPS
16
52%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, £
£319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.98/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£319.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£209.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£195.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£367.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£495.84
In Stock
GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
7.944 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
23.83 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
508.4 GFLOPS
17%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
16 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
7.944 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
23.83 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
508.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |