Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms GeForce 840M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 2645 days newer than GeForce 840M.
Advantages of GeForce 840M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 33 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 34% better in Escape From Tarkov than GeForce 840M - 151 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 840M - 8 vs 2 GB
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£530.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £530.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 12th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 840M | vs | Radeon Pro W6600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
16.02 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1029 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1124 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2580 MHz |
1001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |