The GeForce 830M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 830M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 33 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 830M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
41
84%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 830M vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 830M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
9.2 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
18.4 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
588.8 GFLOPS
30%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 830M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
GeForce 800M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
9.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
18.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
588.8 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |