Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms GeForce 820M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 4100 is 600 days newer than GeForce 820M.
Advantages of GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 45 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than GeForce 820M - 38 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 820M - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce 820M
Mobile • Mar 21st, 2015
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 820M | vs | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.83 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
| 901 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
