The GeForce 820M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 45 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 820M
Mar 21st, 2015
Average FPS
39
32%
Min 1% FPS
15
21%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
121
100%
Min 1% FPS
70
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 820M
Mar 21st, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.83 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
6.48 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
25.92 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
622.1 GFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 820M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.83 GB/s | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.48 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 25.92 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| 622.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 16.2 TFLOPS |
