The Arc Pro A60 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6750 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc Pro A60
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 130 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6750 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc Pro A60
Jun 6th, 2023
Average FPS
90
70%
Min 1% FPS
49
65%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, £
£335
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£335.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£345.62
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£435.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£475.20
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£628.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£459.98
In Stock
Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Arc Pro A60
Jun 6th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
131.2 GPixel/s
79%
Texture Fillrate
262.4 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
8.397 TFLOPS
63%
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.31 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc Pro A60 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 6th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
130 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 12 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 131.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 166.4 GPixel/s |
| 262.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 416 GTexel/s |
| 8.397 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.31 TFLOPS |
