Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Arc A380 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A380 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 161 days older than Arc A380.
Advantages of Arc A380
- Up to 4% better value when playing Rocket League than GeForce RTX 3050 - £0.51 vs £0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than Arc A380 - 300 vs 268 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A380 - 8 vs 6 GB
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for £136.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5468 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
300
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
96%
Price, £
£159.99
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for £159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5468 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Arc A380 | vs | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$149 | MSRP | $249 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |