The Arc A310 is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A310
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- A faster GPU for gaming
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.43/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£220.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£319.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£195.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£209.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£601.87
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£476.01
In Stock
Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
97%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
60%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
90%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A310 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |