Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 2856 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than GeForce 210 - 171 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 31 vs 295 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2.102284212654134%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1.0510358767054067%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$499 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
HBM2 | Type | DDR3 |
2048-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |