Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 557 days older than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 120 vs 210 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
199
98%
Value, £/FPS
£2.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
51%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 14th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR6 |
2048-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
409.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1156 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1471 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |