Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 813 days older than the cheaper Radeon RX 6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Up to 38% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - £123.09 vs £199.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Rust than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - £1.26 vs £1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Radeon RX 6400 - 110 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
98
89%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£123.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £123.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.81/FPS
69%
Price, £
£199
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for £199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
86%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
70%
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$159 | MSRP | $229 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
128 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
1923 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
2321 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |