Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 2339 days newer than Radeon RX 460.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 74% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon RX 460 - 125 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 50 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 6 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon RX 460
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX 460
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
22.79202279202279%
Texel Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
47.863247863247864%
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 460 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| 1090 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1755 MHz |
| 1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
