Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 460 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 460 is 300 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 460
- Performs up to 53% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 23 vs 15 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon RX 460
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX 460
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
98.46153846153845%
Texel Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
58.05059523809524%
AMD Radeon RX 460 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1090 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
