Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo
ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 12G DUAL EVO OC Gaming Graphics Card - 2550MHz Boost Clock, GDDR6X, PCIe Gen 4, DLSS 3, HDMI 2.1a, 3 x DisplayPort 1.4a (Supports 4K & 8K HDR)

Buy for £499.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8935 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo
ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 12G DUAL EVO OC Gaming Graphics Card - 2550MHz Boost Clock, GDDR6X, PCIe Gen 4, DLSS 3, HDMI 2.1a, 3 x DisplayPort 1.4a (Supports 4K & 8K HDR)

Buy for £499.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8935 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4070 is 2785 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano

  • Consumes up to 12% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 - 175 vs 200 Watts

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

  • Performs up to 104% better in Battlefield 1 than Radeon R9 Nano - 212 vs 104 FPS
  • Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 12 vs 4 GB
This is a free version of Battlefield 1.
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


FPS

104

49%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo
GeForce RTX 4070

Desktop • Apr 12th, 2023


FPS

212

100%

Value, £/FPS

£2.36/FPS

100%

Price, £

£499.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 12G DUAL EVO OC Gaming Graphics Card - 2550MHz Boost Clock, GDDR6X, PCIe Gen 4, DLSS 3, HDMI 2.1a, 3 x DisplayPort 1.4a (Supports 4K & 8K HDR)

Buy for £499.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8935 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo
GeForce RTX 4070

Desktop • Apr 12th, 2023

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


Pixel Fillrate

64 GPixel/s

40%

Texel Fillrate

256 GTexel/s

56%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo
GeForce RTX 4070

Desktop • Apr 12th, 2023


Pixel Fillrate

158.4 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

455.4 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Aug 27th, 2015Release Date
Apr 12th, 2023
Pirate IslandsGenerationGeForce 40
$649MSRP
$599
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortOutputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pinPower Connectors1x 16-pin
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4 GBMemory
12 GB
HBMTypeGDDR6X
4096-bitBus192-bit
512 GB/s
Bandwidth504.2 GB/s
1000 MHzBase Clock Speed
1920 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed2475 MHz
500 MHzMemory Clock Speed
1313 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R9 Nano or GeForce RTX 4070

Battlefield 1, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.