Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2077 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 42% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 54 vs 38 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 65 vs 290 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
38
70.37037037037037%
Value, £/FPS
£3.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £126.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54547 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
32.375%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
23.545454545454543%
AMD Radeon R9 290X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$549 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |