Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 290 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1935 days newer than Radeon R9 290.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 34% better in F1 22 than Radeon R9 290 - 99 vs 74 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 120 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 6 vs 4 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£383.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $279 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |