Key Differences
In short — Radeon HD 7650M outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon HD 7650M is 787 days older than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon HD 7650M - 3 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- Performs up to 19% better in Sons Of The Forest than Radeon R9 280 - 37 vs 31 FPS
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 20 vs 200 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Radeon HD 7650M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | AMD Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2012 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | London |
| $279 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | None |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
3 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 450 MHz |
| 933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
