Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 3374 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile - 55 vs 110 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Performs up to 378% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Radeon R7 250 - 172 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 12 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
11.111111111111112%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
7.662438519285529%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 12 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1290 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
