Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 1406 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 55 vs 210 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 129% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon R7 250 - 48 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Radeon RX Vega 56
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
15.721266199277672%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
8.98330804248862%
Radeon RX Vega 56
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 14th, 2017 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1156 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1471 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
