Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 203 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 55 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 68% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Radeon R7 250 - 52 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
