Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 660 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 660 is 397 days older than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 82% cheaper than GeForce GTX 660 - £35.95 vs £199.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing Fortnite than GeForce GTX 660 - £1.2 vs £5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 30 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Performs up to 30% better in Fortnite than Radeon R7 240 - 39 vs 30 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
30
76.92307692307693%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£35.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1989 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
FPS
39
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.13/FPS
23.391812865497073%
Price, £
£199.98
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for £199.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1989 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27.131782945736433%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
16.95736434108527%
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2012 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
$69 | MSRP | $229 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 980 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1032 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |