Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 89% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £45.95 vs £399.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £1.07 vs £4.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 88% better in Battlefield 2042 than Radeon R7 240 - 81 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
43
53%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£45.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £45.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12640 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
81
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.94/FPS
21%
Price, £
£399.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |