Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 72% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - £35.95 vs £129.4
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 30 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Radeon R7 240 - 140 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 600 minutes ago
Buy for £129.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27.027027027027028%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
33.78378378378378%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$69 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |