Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R5 230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3332 days newer than Radeon R5 230.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 19 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 24% better in Deathloop than Radeon R5 230 - 113 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 16 vs 1 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
113
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£489.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £489.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |