Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1806 days older than GeForce GTX 1660.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1660 - 102 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 19 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 6 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
2.917833800186741%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
3.1826861871419476%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |