Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms Radeon R5 230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 3409 days newer than Radeon R5 230.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 19 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R5 230 - 42 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
1.6005121638924455%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
1.6010246557796988%
Radeon PRO W7600
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
| 667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
