Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 982 days older than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 75 vs 70 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
73%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $399 | MSRP | $279 |
| 4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1125 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1201 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
