Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1630 is 1092 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 21% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1630 - £126.27 vs £159.99
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 59 vs 54 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £126.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74550 minutes ago
Buy for £159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74550 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
72.54901960784314%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
72.54901960784314%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |