Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1630 is 1092 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 33% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1630 - £124.83 vs £184.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing New World than GeForce GTX 1630 - £1.95 vs £2.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Performs up to 6% better in New World than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 68 vs 64 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
64
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.95/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £124.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
FPS
68
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.72/FPS
71%
Price, £
£184.99
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for £184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
72%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |