Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 1948 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 15% better in Rocket League than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 234 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 30 vs 65 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
69.64285714285714%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
69.66071428571429%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
| $199 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |
